<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: f0.95 Lenses - Canon and Leica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photicious.com/f095-lenses-canon-and-leica/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photicious.com/f095-lenses-canon-and-leica</link>
	<description>leaning towards Wedding Photography, my favorite</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wedding Photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.photicious.com/f095-lenses-canon-and-leica/comment-page-1#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedding Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photicious.com/f095-lenses-canon-and-leica#comment-350</guid>
		<description>I ask myself if these lenses are really so usable. Wide open their depth of field is tiny. So you have to stop down the aperture anyway to get a usable photo. Therefore the ƒ .95 only help to focus where with 1.4 or so, you can't. Is this worth the extra bucks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ask myself if these lenses are really so usable. Wide open their depth of field is tiny. So you have to stop down the aperture anyway to get a usable photo. Therefore the ƒ .95 only help to focus where with 1.4 or so, you can&#8217;t. Is this worth the extra bucks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
